This
month I want to share with you some highlights from my latest trip to China.
I
visited ten factories, one real estate project and met with management from
three other companies. The meetings in
aggregate provide a representative cross section of economic life in arguably
China’s most important province, even if somewhat skewed towards traditional manufacturing
industries. I also encountered a diverse
group of corporate personnel from CFOs to shop floor supervisors.
The
majority of companies were located in or around Dongguan and Shenzhen, but
visits included Foshan, Qing Yuan City, Panyu, Shunde, and Zhuhai. There was also time to walk around a couple
of shopping centres. We stayed in a
hotel owned by a company where some of our clients are invested. On that note I can confirm that the Ritz
Carlton in downtown Guangzhou has an outstanding Chinese restaurant : for food,
ambience and service.
Ritz Carlton Guangdong |
Guangdong
has been among the most progressive parts of China. Of course its proximity to Hong Kong has been
more than helpful. Some thirty years back
early entrepreneurs began to build businesses across the border. Thus the main metropolitan areas are mostly
mature. That said there is still modest
inward migration into key cities such as Guangzhou and Shenzhen. Yet as of 2015 most residential real estate
activity is driven by upgraders. Anything
built before 2000 looks shabby and second rate.
Interiors too have come a long way as have buyer expectations. Bare shell still predominates, but fully
fitted is the future.
There
is plenty of money. We saw no old cars
on the road only in the wrecker yards. At
all levels wages in real terms are still rising as they have done since the
1990s. One company talked about the days
– not so long ago – when it paid R400 per month fully loaded to shop floor
workers, whereas the better ones now take over R4,000 back to their dormitory. R2,000 is the starting point. Not a lot to live on, but move up the
productivity ranks and your net can support a lifestyle that goes beyond the bare
necessities. Expectations are that real wage
rates will go up again next year by 3-5%.
This
may explain in part comments on several occasions about a shift in priorities
and spending patterns. Maslow’s needs
hierarchy is not just a neat theory. It
plays out in practice. Food first : then
shelter. Something basic to begin with :
then the better things. After that comes
appearance; what other people see.
Clothes of course and accessories especially bags. You can of course have too much of a good
thing.
The
Daphne store – a mid-end national shoe chain - was tired. Everything appeared to be on sale. Our interpreter remarked that the quality of
the shoes are not good enough for R299.
Next door Belle – a higher end retailer - looked a lot more appealing. There were no customers when we were there but
the saleswomen seemed happy enough claiming some of the styles in the new
collection were selling well at R1,200.
The jewellery area of one mall was deserted. No one stopped even to browse at Chow Tai
Fook or Luk Fook. Jewellery results may
not get better for a while.
Interestingly the following week both companies duly delivered profit
warnings for 2015. We knew things were
bad in Hong Kong, but China is not going to bail these businesses out, not
based on our sample at least.
Having
met basic needs, the question turns to where Chinese consumption will
flow. The anti-corruption campaign does
seem to have altered behaviour reigning in
conspicuous spending. Wine, high
end spirit sales and even restaurants are all suffering. It is not back to noodles, but suckling pigs
are a little safer. One theory is that
more money will now go into making homes nicer.
Smart appliances is a possible destination, especially as product
upgrades embrace the Internet of Things.
Model cycles seem to be getting shorter if nowhere near the turnover of mobile
phones. Furniture could also see more
money. Decoration is another
possibility, such as better floor tiles and lamps.
In
the manufacturing world a strong currency does hurt, though there is a not
insubstantial cost offset due to overseas sourcing of raw materials and
components. The TPP was a subject that came
up several times. Some companies have already
positioned for this expanding in Cambodia, Indonesia, the Philippines and
Vietnam. Others claim to be less concerned
claiming worker productivity, supply chain clusters and lower logistics costs
will outweigh duty benefits. These points
have merit. Yet it was noteworthy that Coach
had stopped sending bag orders to one supplier for just this reason, while
another claimed it had been wining new business for their plants in countries
that stand to benefit; and higher end capacity in those countries is for now so
limited that they were able to require customers to allocate part of any order
to China if they wanted to secure space in duty friendly locations.
One
common trend was moving up the quality curve.
We saw this everywhere if manifested in different ways. The shift included new products with more
features, or better appearance, more emphasis on the QC role, and increased
investment in R&D. Cost is still under
the microscope but the cost/quality trade-off is more nuanced as companies
reassess customer priorities. In that
hierarchy there appear to be regional variations. The Japanese are quality fanatics. Many American companies maintain a focus on
cost first and foremost – one supervisor commented that Gap is crap – while
Europeans appear to lie somewhere in the middle. An American brand that will remain unnamed
was buying all the leather rejected by Prada.
Still
cost was not neglected, but the emphasis was not on cheaper and cheerful, or
even plain cheap as used to be the case.
Automation featured everywhere even though the economic advantages
varied. It made an impact in a variety
of ways notably through declining defect rates, as well as reduction in the
number of workers on the factory floor. Welling,
the world’s largest manufacturer of micro motors, had installed Yaskawa robots
since my last visit 2½ years ago. Among
other improvements that investment had contributed to a workforce decline of
over 50% during the period.
Interestingly
Sitoy, China’s largest manufacturer of handbags, had such a poor experience
with specialised machinery that was supposed to spot defects in leather that
they were barely using the semi-automated process. Experienced people were apparently more cost
effective, and getting the most out of such expensive raw material was one of
the keys to better margins. So not all
one way – but the trend is more machines and less people. This trend is only going to accelerate as
good workers get harder to find and retain in Guangdong; and of course they cost
more each year, bringing down the breakeven point for capital/labour
substitution and accelerating the payback period.
I
have pulled out a couple of key points from each company visit to illustrate
what is going on at the businesses.
Luen Thai (garment cut and
sew plant and separate handbag plant)
Uniqlo growth in China a key driver.
Uniqlo employees sit on the sewing line. Quality similar to shirts that
sell at twice the price.
Ballooning business at Batam facility, yet excess capacity in China. Balance will be a challenge.
Expects to be a big beneficiary of TPP
Skyworth (TV production and
set top box assembly : market leader in both products in China)
Is OLED the next new wave? OLED
panel availability a possible bottleneck
Game playing over large panel smart TVs should be a key driver for
model upgrades at higher margins
QC area has seen significant automation advances since my last visit 2½
years ago.
Packaging going through automation conversion : will cut the number of
workers on that part of the line by over 70%.
Expansion of set top box capacity in purpose built plant will introduce
more efficiency and significantly reduce subcontracting. In-house production should mean better gross
margins in 2016/17.
Expanding commercial real estate
portfolio and growing rental roll : 2017 fiscal impact could be material.
Hopefluent (largest real
estate broker in Guangdong)
Market back into
positive unit growth and ASPs rising once again though still some patches of
weakness. Shenzhen exceptionally strong. Shortage of new projects in some places
Banks making life
much easier for borrowers both in lending terms and speed of processing
mortgage applications. Sales are easier
to close than at start of year.
Disruptive models like Soufun only work in the secondary market and
have Kamikaze elements. Soufun hiring
mostly poor producers.
Sitoy (China’s largest
manufacturer of handbags)
An experienced
workforce is key to productivity and margin.
3+year cutter can achieve up to 50% less material waste than one with
just six months on the job.
Have implemented
multi-faceted employee compensation structure.
Developing own
brand to capture full channel margin.
Base OEM price gets marked up roughly 6x to retail on Madison Avenue
(sometimes more!)
Dramatic
variation in leather quality across brands.
Very impressive design studio/capability
Samson (Largest manufacturer
of case goods in China)
Sees furniture
market picking up in the US after long hiatus.
Now able to
justify major upgrade of plant and machinery : first serious cap x since 2008. Upgrading both for productivity and to reduce
pollution.
Veneer
application a key element of product quality and cost driver. Expertise in this area a critical competitive
competence.
Hotel industry also in positive refurbishment cycle after long weak
period post GFC.
Dongpeng Holdings (one of
three major tile manufacturers, probably the market leader)
Main tile plant
impressive with high degree of automation especially in polishing and painting,
plus driverless fork lifts on the shop floor and in the warehouse.
Low cost producer
when at full throttle (it was when we were there)
Moving product
mix up market with major investment in design and product range expansion
Sales channels shifting
as more developers go for fully fitted units, a trend that is likely to
continue. Makes marketing easier.
MIS a key
priority with company connecting distributors to SAP system for better
information flow and control (and significant personnel savings).
Material value to be unlocked when company moves from Foshan downtown
site, but timing unknown.
Goldpac (#4 worldwide and #1
in China for credit cards)
Amazing that
largest centre for card personalisation in the world (900 million cards p.a.) is
so small.
Linked in to
Union Pay, so benefits from their strategy to go global.
Interesting
extension of full service hardware and software card issuance to standalone remote
locations. Is this a major new business?
Conversion to
local Chinese chip manufacturers going slowly.
Infineon gaining share from
dominant niche provider NXP.
Healthcare card will be a massive new sector, but who is going to pay?
Welling (World’s largest
manufacturer of micro motors for air conditioners and washing machines)
Significant
reconfiguration of assembly process with meaningful increase in average employee
productivity.
Development of
dedicated customer lines for global leaders.
New motor line
comes from a Chinese equipment supplier replacing traditional supplier, an Italian
machine builder : same efficiency but less than half the capital cost for similar
throughput.
Material
inventory managed down to 3 days. JIT in
action.
Further workforce shrinkage expected over next three years.
China
is changing. The factory of the world is
yesterday’s business model. Yet
industrial public companies can still provide investors with attractive
opportunities even as the service sector becomes the main driver for
growth. Some of these HK listed names
should deliver solid earnings improvement while available now on single digit
P/Es.
All
these companies recognise the growing importance of quality of employee versus basic
payroll. Automation was not just a
factory floor issue : it is starting to affect the office as well. Still it seems like there is still a lot of
low hanging fruit to pluck, and we were seeing the better companies. ROCE could and should improve. Innovation and efficiency gains suggest price
deflation (even excluding raw materials) has further to go. This implies anything beyond single digit
sales growth is going to be a challenge, but profitability will be more in
focus and therefore profit growth could be relatively easier. Companies that do not participate in these
changes will disappear. If the management
of companies you own do not embrace these trends, consider transferring
investment allegiance to those that do.
There are plenty to choose from.
2003-2013
was all about the top line and getting bigger fast. 2015-2025 could be about getting more
profitable and making more careful use of capital. Too early to be sure but some encouraging signs
are there.
Please
feel free to give me your feedback if you have seen similar trends or
disagree. Thank you.